Law Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Law Questions - Essay ExampleThe International Terrorism Act of 1990 2. The Patriots Act 3. The UN approach pattern on International Terrorism 3 There are various definitions attached to terrorism. The United Nations, the Arab Convention and the European Convention all give divergent definitions to the term terrorism. The UNs definition to terrorism is more than descriptive of the acts that may be cited as terrorism acts. It adopts a bighearted description of acts that may be interpreted to be acts of terrorism by its members. This includes improper actions, including against civilians, carried out with an intention of causing serious bodily harm or the taking of hostages to induce a state of terror to the public. It therefore offers a broad definition to the term that allows other twist acts against the state or citizens, which have not yet been classified as terrorist acts, to be categorized as terrorist acts. The Arab Convention on the other hand adopts a more liberal defini tion to terrorism. It defines terrorism to encompass not only acts, but also threat of savage action against the state or citizens of a given country. The convention also recognizes that terrorist threats may also be directed to the environment in an attempt to embark national resources. The European convention adopts an imprecise definition to terrorism. ... 4 The yunis case amplifies Americas re bracinged efforts to curb international terrorism by employing the new antiterrorism legalitys. The case demonstrated the acceptance of recent international law principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction that give room for the prosecution of terrorists in US soil. It encompasses the international law principle that terrorism is an act condemned internationally and as such, terrorist suspects can be hired in any national jurisdiction of the world. The Noriega case illustrated the application of domestic criminal laws universally to prosecute criminal activities committed outside the Un ited States. The court relied on the international law principle of extended territorial jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed outside the US national borders, whose effects had far-reaching consequences on American soil. The Yousef case illustrated the use of extraterritorial jurisdiction to prosecute the accused with charges of terrorism and gang to commit criminal and terrorist acts within the territory of the United States. All the aforementioned cases are regarded as progressive cases as they form a future prototype for prosecuting terrorists within the US territory. They further show the expanded use of both the domestic law and international law to combat efficiently the threat of terrorism in America. 5 The Moussaoui case is important because it illustrates the success of the criminal justice system in trying and convicting suspected terrorists. It also shows that the best way to celebrate in promoting national security is reaffirmation of the values of the justice s ystem. Moussaui wanted to review his confession to which the prosecution was opposed to such